hess opinions "forecaster priorities for improving probabilistic flood forecasts"
Clicks: 126
ID: 190541
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
125 views
20 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Hydrological ensemble prediction systems (HEPS) have in recent years been
increasingly used for the operational forecasting of floods by European
hydrometeorological agencies. The most obvious advantage of HEPS is that
more of the uncertainty in the modelling system can be assessed. In
addition, ensemble prediction systems generally have better skill than
deterministic systems both in the terms of the mean forecast performance and
the potential forecasting of extreme events. Research efforts have so far
mostly been devoted to the improvement of the physical and technical aspects
of the model systems, such as increased resolution in time and space and
better description of physical processes. Developments like these are
certainly needed; however, in this paper we argue that there are other areas
of HEPS that need urgent attention. This was also the result from a
group exercise and a survey conducted to operational forecasters within the
European Flood Awareness System (EFAS) to identify the top priorities of
improvement regarding their own system. They turned out to span a range of
areas, the most popular being to include verification of an assessment of past
forecast performance, a multi-model approach for hydrological modelling, to
increase the forecast skill on the medium range (>3 days) and
more focus on education and training on the interpretation of forecasts. In
light of limited resources, we suggest a simple model to classify the
identified priorities in terms of their cost and complexity to decide in
which order to tackle them. This model is then used to create an action plan
of short-, medium- and long-term research priorities with the ultimate goal
of an optimal improvement of EFAS in particular and to spur the
development of operational HEPS in general.
| Reference Key |
wetterhall2013hydrologyhess
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;F. Wetterhall;F. Pappenberger;L. Alfieri;H. L. Cloke;J. Thielen-del Pozo;S. Balabanova;J. Daňhelka;A. Vogelbacher;P. Salamon;I. Carrasco;A. J. Cabrera-Tordera;M. Corzo-Toscano;M. Garcia-Padilla;R. J. Garcia-Sanchez;C. Ardilouze;S. Jurela;B. Terek;A. Csik;J. Casey;G. Stankūnavičius;V. Ceres;E. Sprokkereef;J. Stam;E. Anghel;D. Vladikovic;C. Alionte Eklund;N. Hjerdt;H. Djerv;F. Holmberg;J. Nilsson;K. Nyström;M. Sušnik;M. Hazlinger;M. Holubecka |
| Journal | materials research bulletin |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.5194/hess-17-4389-2013
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.