hess opinions "forecaster priorities for improving probabilistic flood forecasts"

Clicks: 126
ID: 190541
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Hydrological ensemble prediction systems (HEPS) have in recent years been increasingly used for the operational forecasting of floods by European hydrometeorological agencies. The most obvious advantage of HEPS is that more of the uncertainty in the modelling system can be assessed. In addition, ensemble prediction systems generally have better skill than deterministic systems both in the terms of the mean forecast performance and the potential forecasting of extreme events. Research efforts have so far mostly been devoted to the improvement of the physical and technical aspects of the model systems, such as increased resolution in time and space and better description of physical processes. Developments like these are certainly needed; however, in this paper we argue that there are other areas of HEPS that need urgent attention. This was also the result from a group exercise and a survey conducted to operational forecasters within the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS) to identify the top priorities of improvement regarding their own system. They turned out to span a range of areas, the most popular being to include verification of an assessment of past forecast performance, a multi-model approach for hydrological modelling, to increase the forecast skill on the medium range (>3 days) and more focus on education and training on the interpretation of forecasts. In light of limited resources, we suggest a simple model to classify the identified priorities in terms of their cost and complexity to decide in which order to tackle them. This model is then used to create an action plan of short-, medium- and long-term research priorities with the ultimate goal of an optimal improvement of EFAS in particular and to spur the development of operational HEPS in general.
Reference Key
wetterhall2013hydrologyhess Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;F. Wetterhall;F. Pappenberger;L. Alfieri;H. L. Cloke;J. Thielen-del Pozo;S. Balabanova;J. Daňhelka;A. Vogelbacher;P. Salamon;I. Carrasco;A. J. Cabrera-Tordera;M. Corzo-Toscano;M. Garcia-Padilla;R. J. Garcia-Sanchez;C. Ardilouze;S. Jurela;B. Terek;A. Csik;J. Casey;G. Stankūnavičius;V. Ceres;E. Sprokkereef;J. Stam;E. Anghel;D. Vladikovic;C. Alionte Eklund;N. Hjerdt;H. Djerv;F. Holmberg;J. Nilsson;K. Nyström;M. Sušnik;M. Hazlinger;M. Holubecka
Journal materials research bulletin
Year 2013
DOI
10.5194/hess-17-4389-2013
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.