bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width measurement with sd-oct: a method to correct for the opening size of bruch’s membrane

Clicks: 116
ID: 190522
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #142 of 167 articles by views in chemical reviews

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 167 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A precise evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) is key for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma. The Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) has been proposed as a reproducible assessment of the optic nerve. The BMO-MRW measures the minimum distance from the BMO to the internal limiting membrane. We propose an approach to correct the BMO-MRW using the BMO size for increased accuracy in interindividual comparisons in future studies. Eighty-one healthy patients received SPECTRALIS spectral domain optical coherence tomography measurements for the peripapillary RNFLT and BMO-MRW. We calculated a BMO size-corrected BMO-MRW using the mean BMO size of our cohort. BMO size was defined using the manufacturer-provided BMO area and manually measured BMO perimeter. We observed that the BMO-MRW correlated highly with the perimeter (r=−0.553, p<0.0001) and the area of the BMO (r=−0.546, p<0.0001). Using these parameters, we provided a corrected BMO size-adjusted BMO-MRW which was better correlated with the RNFLT compared to the noncorrected one (z=−3.3495, p=0.0004). We demonstrated the dependency of the BMO-MRW on ONH size. Furthermore, we showed the superiority of the corrected BMO-MRW using either the manually measured optic nerve head perimeter or the automatically provided ONH for future studies.
Reference Key
kromer2017journalbruchs Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Robert Kromer;Martin Stephan Spitzer
Journal chemical reviews
Year 2017
DOI
10.1155/2017/8963267
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.