el sistema de recursos procesales en el Ámbito civil en un estado democrÁtico deliberativo
Clicks: 46
ID: 190519
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
13.5
/100
46 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #26 of 32 articles by views in set-valued and variational analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
El artículo aborda el cambio de paradigma que representa el establecimiento del recurso de nulidad, como único medio de impugnación en contra de las sentencias definitivas, que se pretende implementar en la proyectada reforma del sistema procesal civil chileno. Para alcanzar ha comprender las diversas aristas del problema se tematiza la función que desarrollan los jueces en el procedimiento de adjudicación en un Estado de Derecho, como las limitaciones que se presentan en atención a los criterios de organización de la tutela procesal que inspiran la reforma y la adopción del sistema de libre valoración de la prueba (o sana crítica).
The article approaches the change of paradigm that represents the establishment of the nullity recourse as the only mean of impugnation against final judgments, as it is intended to be in the projected reform of the Chilean civil procedural system. To understand the several edges of the problem, the author analyze the function that judges develops in the procedure of awarding in a context of Rule of Law, as well as the limitations that are presented in consideration of the organization criteria of the procedural protection that inspire the reform, and the adoption of the system of free appraisal of the evidence (or healthy criticism).
The article approaches the change of paradigm that represents the establishment of the nullity recourse as the only mean of impugnation against final judgments, as it is intended to be in the projected reform of the Chilean civil procedural system. To understand the several edges of the problem, the author analyze the function that judges develops in the procedure of awarding in a context of Rule of Law, as well as the limitations that are presented in consideration of the organization criteria of the procedural protection that inspire the reform, and the adoption of the system of free appraisal of the evidence (or healthy criticism).
| Reference Key |
ojeda2008iusel
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Raúl Núñez Ojeda |
| Journal | set-valued and variational analysis |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.