controversial aspects regarding tax evasion
Clicks: 298
ID: 190454
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
298 views
71 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #84 of 221 articles by views in Environmental monitoring and assessment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 221 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Throughout the paper, we have highlighted some controversial aspects regarding the crime of tax evasion, referring
to some important decisions of the High Court of Cassation and Justice and also of the Bucharest Court of Appeal. Debating
upon the impunity provision stated by art. 10 of Law no. 241/2005, the study also sheds light upon the issue of the perspective
of the judicial organs regarding the juridical regime of the tax due for dividends. The main focus of the paper leads to the
situations when there is legal ground for the tax due for dividends to be considered part of the damage caused by tax evasion
crime. The study includes a short analysis of some relevant provisions of the Romanian Fiscal Code and also some aspects
deriving from decisions issued by the Administrative and Tax Litigation Chamber of The High Court of Cassation and Justice
concerning the legal regime of dividends. Consequently, the authors are presenting both perspectives of the interpretation of
the issue regarding the tax due for dividends to be considered part of the damage caused by tax evasion crime, resulting from
two decisions of the two Criminal Sections of The Bucharest Court of Appeal, also arguing in favour of the most solid
interpretation among them
| Reference Key |
sinescu2018challengescontroversial
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mircea-Constantin SINESCU;Adrian-Lucian CATRINOIU |
| Journal | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.