preliminary experience using full-spectrum endoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: matched case controlled study
Clicks: 275
ID: 190000
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
275 views
67 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #28 of 188 articles by views in colloids and surfaces a: physicochemical and engineering aspects
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 188 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background/Aim. High-quality colonoscopy is needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer. Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) has recently shown potential in improving adenoma detection during colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of FUSE colonoscopy. Methods. From April 2015 to February 2016, 130 patients underwent FUSE colonoscopy for screening at a tertiary cancer center. Cecal intubation rate (CIR), procedure time, polyp/adenoma detection rate (PDR/ADR), and mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) were compared in matched-control patients (n=260) who underwent standard colonoscopy (SC). Accordingly, endoscopists subjectively evaluated the utility of FUSE colonoscopy. Results. The CIR of FUSE colonoscopy was 94.6%. Cecal intubation time (8.8 min versus 5.1 min, P<0.001) and total procedure time (21.6 min versus 17.3 min, P<0.001) in the FUSE group were significantly longer than those in the SC group. PDR (68.3 versus 71.2%, P=0.567), ADR (63.4% versus 58.5%, P=0.355), and APC (1.4 versus 1.4, P=0.917) were not significantly different between the two groups. The wide view of FUSE colonoscopy was superior to that of SC based on the questionnaires. Conclusions. FUSE colonoscopy did not demonstrate superiority to SC in a clinical setting.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (110 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
ito2016gastroenterologypreliminary
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Sayo Ito;Kinichi Hotta;Kenichiro Imai;Masao Yoshida;Kimihiro Igarashi;Yuichiro Yamaguchi;Kohei Takizawa;Naomi Kakushima;Masaki Tanaka;Noboru Kawata;Hiroyuki Matsubayashi;Hirotoshi Ishiwatari;Hiroyuki Ono |
| Journal | colloids and surfaces a: physicochemical and engineering aspects |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2016/1349436
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.