flow diversion panacea or poison?

Clicks: 126
ID: 189805
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. the use of FD has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the Pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs.
Reference Key
ezanaty2014frontiersflow Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Mario eZanaty;Nohra eChalouhi;Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris;Robert H Rosenwasser;L. Fernando eGonzalez;Pascal eJabbour
Journal journal of photochemistry and photobiology a: chemistry
Year 2014
DOI
10.3389/fneur.2014.00021
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.