flow diversion panacea or poison?
Clicks: 126
ID: 189805
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
125 views
23 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. the use of FD has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the Pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs.
| Reference Key |
ezanaty2014frontiersflow
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mario eZanaty;Nohra eChalouhi;Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris;Robert H Rosenwasser;L. Fernando eGonzalez;Pascal eJabbour |
| Journal | journal of photochemistry and photobiology a: chemistry |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fneur.2014.00021
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.