superforecasting: the art and science of prediction. by philip tetlock and dan gardner
Clicks: 124
ID: 189751
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
124 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #70 of 82 articles by views in world neurosurgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Let me say from the outset that this is an excellent book to read. It is not only informative, as it should be for a book on forecasting, but it is highly entertaining.[...]
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (33 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
buncic2016riskssuperforecasting:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Daniel Buncic |
| Journal | world neurosurgery |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.3390/risks4030024
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.