the identity of hornera jungh. (thymeleaceae)

Clicks: 45
ID: 188787
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #86 of 95 articles by views in Çukurova Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Dr. Airy Shaw (Van Steenis, Fl. Males. Ser. I, 6(1): 48. 1960), referred
Hornera Jungh. (Tijdschr. natuurl. Geschied. & Physiol. 7: 314. 1840) ten-
tatively to Lauraceae.
Hornera was described in an article with the misleading title: Nova
genera et species plantarum Javanicum, as the species numbered 22 to 27
are from Japan. Under no. 22 there is a remark: "siccatam e regius japonico
accepi".
Flora Malesiana gives no clue where this Japanese collection came from;
no collecting localities and no collectors are mentioned by Junghuhn).
According to Maximowicz (in Bentham & Hooker f., Gen. PI. 3: 188—
189. 1880) the genus should not be Japanese; this wrong statement is
apparently due to the fact, that Maximowicz could not attribute the genus
in its circumscription to any Japanese plant.
Reference Key
kostermans2015reinwardtiathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;A. J. G. H. KOSTERMANS
Journal Çukurova Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.