studi kritis terhadap ilmu balaghah klasik
Clicks: 154
ID: 188382
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
154 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #20 of 31 articles by views in 2016 24th signal processing and communication application conference, siu 2016 - proceedings
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Classical Balaghah has been developed theoretically since the era of B. Mu’taz
and culminated in the development in the era of al-Qahir al-Jurjani. But since then, if
has ceased to improve. In the modern era, this science has only been applied, annotated,
redefined and classified. As a consequence, Balaghah turned out to be both dry and
static, incapable of further improvement and adaptation to new circumstances. It is in
this context that this science should be revisited so that new formulation may be fund.
| Reference Key |
aziz2014islamica:studi
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Husein Aziz |
| Journal | 2016 24th signal processing and communication application conference, siu 2016 - proceedings |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.15642/islamica.2007.1.2.174-180
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.