evaluating the teacher’s own work: areas, understanding, cooperation

Clicks: 23
ID: 188373
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #29 of 32 articles by views in comparative biochemistry and physiology part a, molecular & integrative physiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The material analyzed was part of the data gathered during external evaluations concerning teachers’ evaluation of their own work and involving others in its realization. The data were subject to quantitative and qualitative analyses. The research demonstrates that the most frequently evaluated areas are teaching methods, students’ attainments, and the assessment and adaptation of the requirements to students’ needs and capacities. Few teachers point at forms of involving other teachers in evaluation related to the research process. When they do, the cooperation mostly helps in preparing evaluation tools and gathering data.
Reference Key
koodziejczyk2015forumevaluating Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Jakub Kołodziejczyk;Joanna Kołodziejczyk
Journal comparative biochemistry and physiology part a, molecular & integrative physiology
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.