perbedaan waktu pemberian jawaban dan hasil tes inteligensi ditinjau dari perbedaan lembar jawaban
Clicks: 125
ID: 187464
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
125 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #9 of 17 articles by views in acta materialia turcica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Many intelligence test administered designed as paper and pencil test. But efficiency demand in this time make it administered using computer answer sheet, and testie forced to give answer by blackening answer dots using 2B computer pencil in answer sheet. This method reduce testie time to think the right answer, and may influence intelligence test result. This study aimed to compare time to fill answer sheet and intelligence test results, between testie who did test with paper and pencil answer sheet and testie who did test with computer answer sheet. Experiment method choseed in this study. Simple design with repeated sample used in first experiment step. Prior, subjects were assigned to fill answer sheet by streak. And then they assigned to give answer by blackening answer dots. Data analysis show that there were significant difference between first and second assignment (F = 192.192, p < 0.05). Two independent group design used in the second experiment step. Subjects were randomly assigned to join control group or experiment group. Subjects in control group did test using paper and pencil answer sheet, while subjects in experiment group did test using computer answer sheet. Data analysis show that there were significant difference in intelligence level between control group and experiment group in CFIT A (t = 1.681, p < 0.05; one tailed), CFIT B (t = 2.289, p < 0.05; one tailed), and CFIT A and B (t = 1.819, p < 0.05; one tailed). Control group consistently higher in intelligence test results than experiment group.
Keywords: intelligence test, CFIT, computer answer sheet
| Reference Key |
saptoto2013jurnalperbedaan
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ridwan Saptoto |
| Journal | acta materialia turcica |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.22146/jpsi.6988
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.