assessment of activated porous granules on implant fixation and early bone formation in sheep

Clicks: 469
ID: 187105
2016
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 56 articles by views in onderstepoort journal of veterinary research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Background/Objective: Despite recent progress in regeneration medicine, the repair of large bone defects due to trauma, inflammation and tumor surgery remains a major clinical challenge. This study was designed to produce large amounts of viable bone graft materials in a novel perfusion bioreactor to promote bone formation. Methods: Cylindrical defects were created bilaterally in the distal femurs of sheep, and titanium implants were inserted. The concentric gap around the implants was randomly filled either with allograft, granules, granules with bone marrow aspirate (BMA) or bioreactor activated granule (BAG). The viable BAG consisted of autologous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) seeded upon porous scaffold granules incubated in a 3D perfusion bioreactor for 2 weeks prior to surgery. 6 weeks after, the bone formation and early implant fixation were assessed by means of micro-CT, histomorphometry, and mechanical test. Results: Microarchitectural analysis revealed that bone volume fraction and trabecular thickness in the allograft were not statistically different than those (combination of new bone and residue of granule) in the other 3 groups. The structure of the allograft group was typically plate-like, while the other 3 groups were combination of plate and rod. Histomorphometry showed that allograft induced significantly more bone and less fibrous tissue in the concentric gap than the other 3 granule groups, while the bone ingrowth to implant porous surface was not different. No significant differences among the groups were found regarding early implant mechanical fixation. Conclusion: In conclusion, despite nice bone formation and implant fixation in all groups, bioreactor activated graft material did not convincingly induce early implant fixation similar to allograft, and neither bioreactor nor by adding BMA credited additional benefit for bone formation in this model.
Reference Key
ding2016journalassessment Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Ming Ding;Susan S. Henriksen;Naseem Theilgaard;Søren Overgaard
Journal onderstepoort journal of veterinary research
Year 2016
DOI
10.1016/j.jot.2015.09.008
URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X15000728
Keywords
implant fixation histomorphometry microarchitecture

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.