flight software development and validation workflow management system
Clicks: 151
ID: 186738
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
151 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #23 of 32 articles by views in biotechnology letters
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The aerospace industry is undergoing unprecedented transformation. New players, new ventures, and new technologies drive the established business towards a transition from traditional models and strategies to automated production and innovative methods.
Software architecture for space systems needs to become more agile while preserving a high standard of quality. To that end, the rigorous verification and validation process that yields high quality software products should embrace automation and take full advantage of COTS hardware and software products.
In line with the industry transformation, SSL’s Flight Software Development and Validation Department uses a modular, layered architecture that has evolved over decades of orbital experience. This paper describes the SSL Flight Software Development and Validation Workflow Management System and the advantages of such a system/framework for development and verification of very complex spacecraft.
This system/framework allows faster cyclical test-fix-test process and also provides a platform that can be extended for a multitude of applications.
| Reference Key |
gultureanu2018incasflight
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Dan GULTUREANU;Kevin KERNS;Tom HENTHORN;John QUACH;Mitch KLEEN |
| Journal | biotechnology letters |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.13111/2066-8201.2018.10.1.9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.