p300 em trabalhadores expostos a ruído ocupacional p300 in workers exposed to occupational noise

Clicks: 315
ID: 186649
2012
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #26 of 89 articles by views in cardiovascular diabetology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
O prejuízo do ruído para as vias auditivas centrais em trabalhadores expostos a ruído ocupacional tem sido pouco estudado. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as vias auditivas centrais por meio do potencial evocado auditivo de longa latência (P300), em indivíduos normo-ouvintes expostos a ruído. MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo em que foram avaliados 25 indivíduos com limiares auditivos dentro da normalidade. Tais indivíduos foram divididos em dois grupos: expostos a ruído ocupacional (13 sujeitos, grupo pesquisa-GP) e não expostos a ruído ocupacional (12 sujeitos, grupo controle-GC). Foi realizado o P300, utilizando estímulos verbais e não verbais. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre as orelhas para nenhum dos estímulos, em nenhum dos grupos. Tanto para o estímulo verbal como para o não verbal houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos, sendo que o GP apresentou latências maiores que o GC. Na análise qualitativa, observou-se maior número de resultados alterados para o P300 com estímulo não verbal e verbal para o GP, apesar de não haver diferença estatisticamente significante entre eles. CONCLUSÃO: Os indivíduos expostos a níveis de pressão sonora elevados apresentaram, tanto para estímulo verbal quanto para estímulo não verbal, médias de latências do P300 maiores quando comparadas com as do grupo controle.
The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled 25 individuals with normal hearing thresholds. The subjects were divided into two groups: individuals exposed to occupational noise (13 subjects; case group) and individuals not exposed to occupational noise (12 subjects; control group). The P300 test was used with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between ears for any of the stimuli or between groups. The groups had no statistically significant difference for verbal or non-verbal stimuli. Case group subjects had longer latencies than controls. In qualitative analysis, a greater number of altered P300 test results for verbal and non-verbal stimuli was seen in the case group, despite the absence of statistically significant differences between case and control subjects. CONCLUSION: Individuals exposed to high sound pressure levels had longer P300 latencies in verbal and non-verbal stimuli when compared to controls.
Reference Key
massa2012brazilianp300 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Camila Gonçalves Polo Massa, Camila Maia Rabelo, Renata Rodrigues Moreira, Carla Gentile Matas, Eliane Schochat, Alessandra Giannella Samelli
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal cardiovascular diabetology
Year 2012
DOI
10.5935/1808-8694.20120042
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942012000600018
Keywords
electrophysiology event-related potentials p300

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.