news media analysis of carbon capture and storage and biomass: perceptions and possibilities
Clicks: 262
ID: 185664
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
262 views
48 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #134 of 526 articles by views in acs combinatorial science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 526 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the US, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has received most of its attention when coupled with the fossil fuel industry as a mitigation strategy for climate change. CCS, which is constituted as a broad suite of capture and sequestration technologies and techniques, does not preclude coupling with other energy industries such as bioenergy (bioenergy and CCS or BECCS). In this paper, we examined news media coverage of CCS and biomass individually in locations throughout the US where these technologies are being explored to determine how they are perceived and what possibilities lay in their coupling for climate change mitigation. From our analyses, we found that individually, both CCS and biomass are perceived generally as beneficial for energy development by the news media, though they are not often mentioned in combination. Combined references do, however, speak to their value for climate change mitigation and as an alternative to fossil fuels.
| Reference Key |
feldpausch-parker2015energiesnews
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Andrea M. Feldpausch-Parker;Morey Burnham;Maryna Melnik;Meaghan L. Callaghan;Theresa Selfa |
| Journal | acs combinatorial science |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.3390/en8043058
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.