the imaginary and the communication hypostasis
Clicks: 184
ID: 185360
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
184 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #50 of 154 articles by views in Science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 154 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper aims to review the definitions and vagueness of the concept
of imaginary and symbolic, and to relate its limits and its reach within the
research in Communication. The difficulties of the approach in Communication to a notion of course of the sense are addressed. Inherited from the School of Grenoble, this notion underlies the theory of the imaginary. Communication is here considered to be insufficient for the study of the catalysis of imaginaries and the production of symbolic images which are present in communication phenomena. This is due not only to the inadequacy of a process that is described in terms of sender – message – receiver, but especially to the self-e vidence of imaginary and
symbolic, as expressed in the language, resulting in a reduction of the imaginary to its social symptoms.
of imaginary and symbolic, and to relate its limits and its reach within the
research in Communication. The difficulties of the approach in Communication to a notion of course of the sense are addressed. Inherited from the School of Grenoble, this notion underlies the theory of the imaginary. Communication is here considered to be insufficient for the study of the catalysis of imaginaries and the production of symbolic images which are present in communication phenomena. This is due not only to the inadequacy of a process that is described in terms of sender – message – receiver, but especially to the self-e vidence of imaginary and
symbolic, as expressed in the language, resulting in a reduction of the imaginary to its social symptoms.
| Reference Key |
barros2014comunicao,the
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ana Taís Martins Portanova Barros |
| Journal | Science |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.18568/1983-7070.102913-29%y
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.