exploring the critical care nurses’ experiences regarding moonlighting

Clicks: 126
ID: 185114
2001
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #691 of 812 articles by views in Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 812 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While moonlighting is so prevalent amongst critical care nurses, there are no documented facts in this country about how it affects the nurses and the hospital management, considering the nature of their work that is both physically, mentally and emotionally strenuous. The aim of this study was to explore the critical care nurses’ rationale and experiences regarding holding a second job (moonlighting). A non-experimental exploratory study was done using focus groups. Many positive and less positive experiences were revealed, for example, economical, educational, and psychosocial ones. Participatory control of moonlighting activity was suggested involving both management and staff at functional level.
Reference Key
bhengu2001curationisexploring Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;BR Bhengu
Journal Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
Year 2001
DOI
10.4102/curationis.v24i2.826
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.