“underground” economy nature – conceptual status

Clicks: 97
ID: 185056
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #80 of 93 articles by views in 2019 ieee 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications, iciea 2019

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Economical experience is a projection of economic theory. What happens when the unintended consequences are more then those intended? We somehow managed to score the difference between what a science transmits and what we find in reality? We support such that the theory is the source of the crisis of a science? The economic theory of corporate capitalism is now the source of the economics science crisis? Investigations of the above can be multiplied up to a challenge, insufficiently tested, that of demystifying the nature of “underground” economy. Feel more acutely the need to rationally justify a right to conceptualize a reality that, at least statistically, can not be neglected.
Reference Key
voicu2012theoreticalunderground Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Cristina VOICU
Journal 2019 ieee 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications, iciea 2019
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.