histerectomía vaginal sin prolapso genital vaginal hysterectomy without genital prolapse

Clicks: 304
ID: 185030
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 98 articles by views in Endocrine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Se efectuó una investigación analítica, longitudinal y retrospectiva de una muestra de 110 mujeres de un total de 639 con diferentes afecciones de los órganos genitales, excluidas las sépticas, e intervenidas las primeras por vía vaginal durante el quinquenio 2005-2009, las cuales fueron asignadas a 2 grupos: el A, integrado por 37 pacientes sin prolapso genital (técnica de Peham-Amreich); y el B, conformado por 73 féminas con dicho prolapso (técnica de Heany) en estadios clínicos I y II-III, quienes fueron reagrupadas en subgrupos de 32 y 41 pacientes, respectivamente. En la serie se consideraron las variables: edad, sangrado peroperatorio, tiempo quirúrgico, estadía posoperatoria, complicaciones peroperatorias y posoperatorias, así como control ambulatorio (trigésimo día). Las integrantes del grupo A se ajustaron a requerimientos clínicos y ecográficos preseleccionados: útero móvil y equivalente en volumen al puño de un hombre adulto de biotipo medio, campo operatorio suficiente y normalidad en examen de anejos. Para el análisis estadístico se aplicó el test de Pearson, con valores de significación considerados en 3 categorías, a saber: I, p=0,05 (estándar); II, p=0,01 (alta) y III, p=0,001 (muy alta). Se demostró, con muy alta significación, que el prolapso genital es una afección privativa de mujeres de edad superior a 50 años. El resto de las variables escogidas careció de valor estadístico en este estudio.
An analytic, longitudinal and retrospective investigation was carried out in a sample of 110 women from a total of 639 with different disorders of the genitals, excluding the septic ones. The former group had surgeries through vagina during the five year period 2005-2009, and were assigned to 2 groups: group A, formed by 37 women without genital prolapse (Peham-Amreich technique); and group B, formed by 73 women with this disorder (Heany technique) in clinical stages I and II-III, who were regrouped in subgroups of 32 and 41 patients, respectively. Variables such as: age, peroperative bleeding, surgical time, postoperative stay, peroperative and postoperative complications, as well as ambulatory control (thirtieth day) were considered in the series. The members of group A were adjusted to previously selected clinical and echographic requirements: mobile uterus and equivalent in volume to the fist of an adult man of average biotype, adequate operative field and normality in the adnexa examination. For the statistical analysis the Pearson test was applied, with significance values considered in 3 categories, that is: I, p=0.05 (standard); II, p=0.01 (high) and III, p=0.001 (very high). It was significantively demonstrated, that genital prolapse is an exclusive disorder of women over 50 years old. The rest of the chosen variables lacked statistical value in this study.
Reference Key
lamarque2012medisanhisterectoma Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Abelardo S Toirac Lamarque;Viviana Pascual López;Nancy Moya Rodríguez
Journal Endocrine
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.