why did wicksell change his mind about the machinery question?
Clicks: 105
ID: 184388
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
105 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 17 articles by views in harvard international review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article investigates Wicksell's change of mind about the machinery question between 1890 and 1900/1901. Wicksell at first sided with the so-called “compensation theory” that workers are not harmed by the introduction of machinery. In his lecture notes of April 1900, made available here for the first time, Wicksell deployed marginal productivity theory to discuss the effects of labour-saving technical progress, with inconclusive results. Finally, in his published 1901 Lectures and in his 1900 article about marginal productivity, Wicksell claimed that the introduction of machinery increases output and reduces wages. His analysis was based on the demonstration that free competition maximizes output, but not total utility. It is argued that Wicksell's change of mind and his mature formulation of the machinery question result from his critical assessment of the then new concept of Pareto optimality, together with his reinterpretation and rejection of Ricardo's (1821) contention that the introduction of machinery may diminish output and employment.
| Reference Key |
boianovsky2014economiawhy
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mauro Boianovsky |
| Journal | harvard international review |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.econ.2013.11.003
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.