can we be both resilient and well, and what choices do people have? incorporating agency into the resilience debate from a fisheries perspective.

Klik: 254
ID: 184260
2012
Metrik Kualitas & Kinerja Artikel
Kualitas Keseluruhan
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Penilaian Kualitas AI
Belum dianalisis
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #198 of 308 articles by views in ieee access

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 308 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstrak
In the midst of a global fisheries crisis, there has been great interest in the fostering of adaptation and resilience in fisheries, as a means to reduce vulnerability and improve the capacity of fishing society to adapt to change. However, enhanced resilience does not automatically result in improved well-being of people, and adaptation strategies are riddled with difficult choices, or trade-offs, that people must negotiate. This paper uses the context of fisheries to explore some apparent tensions between adapting to change on the one hand, and the pursuit of well-being on the other, and illustrates that trade-offs can operate at different levels of scale. It argues that policies that seek to support fisheries resilience need to be built on a better understanding of the wide range of consequences that adaptation has on fisher well-being, the agency people exert in negotiating their adaptation strategies, and how this feeds back into the resilience of fisheries as a social-ecological system. The paper draws from theories on agency and adaptive preferences to illustrate how agency might be better incorporated into the resilience debate.
Kunci Referensi
coulthard2012ecologycan Gunakan kunci ini untuk mengutip otomatis dalam naskah saat menggunakan SciMatic Manuscript Manager atau Thesis Manager
Penulis ;Sarah Coulthard
Jurnal ieee access
Tahun 2012
DOI
10.5751/ES-04483-170104
URL
Kata Kunci

Sitasi

Tidak ada sitasi yang ditemukan. Untuk menambahkan sitasi, hubungi admin di info@scimatic.org

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama berkomentar pada artikel ini.