evaluation of steadiness and drop size distribution in sprays generated by different twin-fluid atomizers
Clicks: 95
ID: 183545
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
28.2
/100
95 views
6 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #404 of 625 articles by views in utilitas mathematica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 625 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Twin-fluid atomizers underwent a significant development during the last few decades. They are common in many industrial applications such as fuel spraying, melt atomization and food processing. This paper is focused on the evaluation of four different twin-fluid atomizers. The aim is to compare the quality of sprays generated by various atomizers with similar dimensions and in the same operating regimes. A phase- Doppler anemometry (PDA) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) were used to measure spray characteristics such as velocity and size of the droplets. Measured data were used to compare droplet size distribution and to evaluate steadiness of the spray. Visualisations were made to support measured data and to clarify the principles of primary atomization and its influence on the spray.
| Reference Key |
matou2015epjevaluation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Zaremba Matouš;Mlkvik Marek;Malý Milan;Jedelský Jan;Jícha Miroslav |
| Journal | utilitas mathematica |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1051/epjconf/20159202118
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.