the fundamental right to public security and the untermassverbot principle: a required review of the article #152 of the brazilian procedural criminal code
Clicks: 86
ID: 183448
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
25.5
/100
86 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The increasing of violence in Brazil affects the fundamental right to public security. When the State does not sufficiently protects a fundamental right there is a violation of the so-called untermassverbot principle. This paper aims to explore the interpretation of the article #152 of the brazilian procedural criminal code under the untermassverbot principle. The traditional interpretation understands that the criminal procedure will be stopped, but the prescription penal period is not equally interrupted. It is proposed a new reading of that article, under the approaches of the proportionality principle and the integral penal guaranteeism.
| Reference Key |
colho2017revistathe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Marcial Duarte Coêlho |
| Journal | revista de direito penal, processo penal e constituição |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0200/2016.v2i2.1426
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.