crítica textual y estilo: nota a farsalia i 254
Clicks: 5
ID: 183081
1981
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
1.2
/100
5 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #130 of 144 articles by views in south african journal of botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 144 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Almost every Lucan's manuscript has in Pharsalia I 254 the variant furentem (only one gives ruentem), but almost every one of the editors prefers ruentem. The acceptance of ruentem is due to the nearby presence of a furentum and a furoris. Here we maintain furentem as the right reading, on grounds of Lucan's familiar stylistic procedure of repetition of the key terms of a passage. The poetic value of this repetition is endorsed in modern times by R. Jakobson and S. R. Levin.
| Reference Key |
redondo1981emeritacrtica
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Antonio Holgado Redondo |
| Journal | south african journal of botany |
| Year | 1981 |
| DOI |
10.3989/emerita.1981.v49.i2.794
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.