epistemological analysis of theses and dissertations on special education service: 2000 to 2009
Clicks: 239
ID: 183011
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
239 views
43 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #65 of 117 articles by views in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The general aim of this research was to carry out an epistemological analysis of theses and dissertations on special education service written between 2000 and 2009. The analysis is based on the technical and theoretical dimensions and it uses an adaptation of the Paradigmatic Scheme by Sánchez Gamboa (1987, 2007). Following a qualitative approach, the documentary analysis of 18 theses and dissertations was carried out. The results indicate: 1. At the Technical Level: 2009 was the most prolific year for research on special education service; 72% of all the works were produced in public universities; 44% do not specify the recording techniques; 50% do not specify the type of data analysis; 84% present qualitative procedures; 2. Theoretical Level: the main tackled theme was “Hearing Impairment/Deafness” (27.7%); 61% made use of unspecific methodological approaches and types of changes; 17% are classified as critical and dialectical, and 22% are phenomenological and hermeneutic. Most of the works could not be characterized or classified according to a standard methodological approach in view of their hybrid aspect and due the fact that they do not have a methodological boundary. It is essential to extend research on epistemological analysis so that it can effectively contribute to improving studies and directing them towards praxis.
| Reference Key |
casagrande2014revistaepistemological
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rosana Castro Casagrande;Gilmar de Carvalho Cruz |
| Journal | Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.5902/1984686X6986
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.