comparative thermodynamic analysis of dual cycle under alternative conditions

Clicks: 152
ID: 181276
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #265 of 375 articles by views in Nature

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 375 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this paper, finite-time thermodynamic analysis of an air-standard internal-combustion Dual cycle is performed. Maximum power (MP), maximum power density (MPD), maximum efficient power (MEP) which are three alternative performance criteria are derived. The effects of the design parameters such as volume ratio and extreme temperature ratio of the cycle have been investigated under MP, MPD and MEP conditions. The analyzed results of air-standard internal-combustion Dual cycle showed the design parameters at maximum power (MP) conditions and maximum efficient power (MEP) conditions have a significant advantage compared to maximum power density (MPD) criterion.
Reference Key
mustafa2011thermalcomparative Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Atmaca Mustafa;Gümüş Metin;Demir Abdullah
Journal Nature
Year 2011
DOI
10.2298/TSCI110225049A
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.