reseña de la jurisprudencia de la corte interamericana de derechos humanos (2008)
Clicks: 214
ID: 180434
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
214 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #9 of 27 articles by views in cardiology research and practice
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
El artículo revisa críticamente las sentencias dictadas por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos durante el año 2008 que, a juicio de los autores, serán relevantes para la región. A partir del análisis de las sentencias se examina, por una parte, la relación entre la Comisión y la Corte Interamericana; y por otra, el uso del juicio de ponderación al momento de resolver un conflicto de derechos. Igualmente se analizan sentencias que tratan materias críticas relativas a la garantía y respeto del derecho de propiedad, el debido proceso, derechos políticos y libertad de expresión.
| Reference Key |
rojas2009anuarioresea
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Claudio Nash Rojas;Claudia Sarmiento Ramírez |
| Journal | cardiology research and practice |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.5354/adh.v0i5.11518
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.