acknowledgements
Clicks: 82
ID: 180391
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
24.3
/100
82 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #126 of 141 articles by views in The American journal of clinical nutrition
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 141 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Agricultural and Food Science expresses its sincere thanks to the following referees for their constructive critical reviews of one or more manuscripts during the year 2013.
| Reference Key |
rappe2014agricultural
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Erja Rappe |
| Journal | The American journal of clinical nutrition |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.