comparison among single-phase test, automated screening method and gc/ms for the traceability of ketamine in urine
Clicks: 244
ID: 179934
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
244 views
41 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #14 of 28 articles by views in advances in urology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The use of ketamine, for non-medical purpose, results widespread also in Italy. This drug is not searched by institutional centers, charged of the responsibility to realize the execution of toxicological analysis based on the article 187 of The New Italian Highway Code. We evaluated the reliability of the single-phase test comparing it with an automated screening method and a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to search the presence of ketamine on casualty patients involved in car accidents in Rome.
METHODS
The screening analysis were performed by a single-phase test (with a cut-off settled at 1000 ng/ml), and an automated immunoenzymatic assay (cut-off settled at 330 ng/ml). The confirmation tests have been realized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
RESULTS
The single-phase test highlighted ten positive samples out of 294. The automated instrument confirmed only six out of ten previous positive samples, meanwhile the instrument found further four positive samples, considered negative by the single-phase test. The presence of ketamine is confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry only in seven samples out of fourteen resulted positives from both screening analysis. Three samples out of seven confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were positive only to ketamine.
CONCLUSION
Following the law indications, ketamine is not searched: this limit does not make the authorities able to apply the penalties expected for road laws violations. The automation is essential to guarantee the reliability of toxicological screening tests, especially to medico-legal significance. This results highlight the absolutely necessity of the execution of the confirmation test, successively to screening analysis.
| Reference Key |
visione2016epidemiologycomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Alice Visione;Giovanni Michele Lagravinese |
| Journal | advances in urology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.2427/11814
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.