testing of short sale hypotheses on the u.s. market in the period from 1990 to 2015

Clicks: 91
ID: 179819
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #363 of 391 articles by views in Talanta

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 391 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the validity of short sale hypotheses the NYSE and NASDAQ in the period 1990 – 2015. Short has been regulated in the U.S. market since the 1930s by so‑called up‑tick rules and other legal acts. The aim of this regulation was to prevent short sellers from adding to the downward momentum when the price of an asset was already experiencing sharp declines. During the 1990s, short sale regulations changed several times. In this paper, panel regression is applied to investigate short sale determinants on the NYSE and NASDAQ. Short seller motivation and the results are compared with those for particular markets and sub periods that represent different legal regulations of short selling activities in the period from 1990 to 2015.
Reference Key
linnertov2016actatesting Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Dagmar Linnertová
Journal Talanta
Year 2016
DOI
10.11118/actaun201664062025
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.