toxic cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in european waters – recent progress achieved through the cyanocost action and challenges for further research

Clicks: 198
ID: 179514
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #10 of 14 articles by views in photochemical and photobiological sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This review aims to summarise the outcomes of some recent European research concerning toxic cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins, with an emphasis on developments within the framework of the CYANOCOST Action (COST Action ES1105, Cyanobacterial Blooms and Toxins in Water Resources: Occurrence, Impacts and Management). State of the art research and management capabilities in Europe on cyanobacteria have benefitted from input from the pure and applied life sciences, the human and animal health sectors, water engineers, economists and planners. Many of these professional groups have been brought together and they interacted favourably within the framework of CYANOCOST. Highlights of the Action include phycological and ecological studies, development of advanced techniques for cyanotoxin analysis, elucidation of cyanotoxin modes of action, management techniques to reduce cyanobacterial mass development, and research on methods and practices for cyanotoxin removal during drinking water treatment. The CYANOCOST Action has had an active outreach policy throughout its lifetime, resulting in e.g. three handbooks, two special issues in scientific journals and activities in the social media. The many contact channels to end-users, including environmental and drinking water supply authorities, health professionals and the general public are described in this review. Furthermore, the authors have identified a number of gaps in knowledge. Proposed  directions for  future research in the field of toxic cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins are also discussed.
Reference Key
meriluoto2017advancestoxic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Jussi Meriluoto;Ludek Blaha;Gorenka Bojadzija;Myriam Bormans;Luc Brient;Geoffrey A. Codd;Damjana Drobac;Elisabeth J. Faassen;Jutta Fastner;Anastasia Hiskia;Bastiaan W. Ibelings;Triantafyllos Kaloudis;Mikolaj Kokocinski;Rainer Kurmayer;Dijana Pantelić;Antonio Quesada;Nico Salmaso;Nada Tokodi;Theodoros M. Triantis;Petra M. Visser;Zorica Svirčev
Journal photochemical and photobiological sciences
Year 2017
DOI
10.4081/aiol.2017.6429
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.