science communication in regenerative medicine: implications for the role of academic society and science policy
Clicks: 201
ID: 178840
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.6
/100
12 views
12 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
It is essential to understand the hurdles, motivation, and other issues affecting scientists' active participation in science communication to bridge the gap between science and society. This study analyzed 1115 responses of Japanese scientists regarding their attitudes toward science communication through a questionnaire focusing on the field of stem cell and regenerative medicine. As a result, we found that scientists face systemic issues such as lack of funding, time, opportunities, and evaluation systems for science communication. At the same time, there is a disparity of attitudes toward media discourse between scientists and the public.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (93 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
shineha2017regenerativescience
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ryuma Shineha;Yusuke Inoue;Tsunakuni Ikka;Atsuo Kishimoto;Yoshimi Yashiro |
| Journal | micron (oxford, england : 1993) |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.reth.2017.11.001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.