seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the smear ii measurement station in hyytiälä, finland

Clicks: 186
ID: 178575
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #246 of 850 articles by views in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 850 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Scattering and absorption were measured at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) station in Hyytiälä, Finland, from October 2006 to May 2009. The average scattering coefficient &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> (&lambda; = 550 nm) 18 Mm<sup>−1</sup> was about twice as much as at the Pallas Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station in Finnish Lapland. The average absorption coefficient &sigma;<sub>AP</sub> (&lambda; = 550 nm) was 2.1 Mm<sup>−1</sup>. The seasonal cycles were analyzed from hourly-averaged data classified according to the measurement month. The ratio of the highest to the lowest average &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> and &sigma;<sub>AP</sub> was ~1.8 and ~2.8, respectively. The average single-scattering albedo (&omega;<sub>0</sub>) was 0.86 in winter and 0.91 in summer. &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> was highly correlated with the volume concentrations calculated from number size distributions in the size range 0.003–10 μm. Assuming that the particle density was 1.5 g cm<sup>−3</sup>, the PM<sub>10</sub> mass scattering efficiency was 3.1 ± 0.9 g m<sup>−2</sup> at &lambda; = 550 nm. Scattering coefficients were also calculated from the number size distributions by using a Mie code and the refractive index of ammonium sulfate. The linear regression yielded &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>(modelled) = 1.046 &times; &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>(measured) for the data with the low nephelometer sample volume relative humidity (RH<sub>NEPH</sub> = 30 &plusmn; 9 %) and &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>(modelled) = 0.985 &times; &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>(measured) when RH<sub>NEPH</sub> = 55 &plusmn; 4 %. The effective complex refractive index was obtained by an iterative approach, by matching the measured and the modelled &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>and &sigma;<sub>AP</sub>. The average effective complex refractive index was (1.517 ± 0.057) + (0.019 ± 0.015)<i>i</i> at &lambda; = 550 nm. The iterated imaginary part had a strong seasonal cycle, with smallest values in summer and highest in winter. The contribution of submicron particles to scattering was ~90 %. The Ångström exponent of scattering, &sigma;<sub>SP</sub>, was compared with the following weighted mean diameters: count mean diameter (CMD), surface mean diameter (SMD), scattering mean diameter (ScMD), condensation sink mean diameter (CsMD), and volume mean diameter (VMD). If &alpha;<sub>SP</sub> is to be used for estimating some measure of the size of particles, the best choice would be ScMD, then SMD, and then VMD. In all of these the qualitative relationship is similar: the larger the Ångström exponent, the smaller the weighted mean diameter. Contrary to these, CMD increased with increasing &alpha;<sub>SP</sub> and CsMD did not have any clear relationship with &alpha;<sub>SP</sub>. Source regions were estimated with backtrajectories and trajectory statistics. The geometric mean &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> and &sigma;<sub>AP</sub> associated with the grid cells in Eastern Europe were in the range 20–40 Mm<sup>−1</sup> and 4–6 Mm<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The respective geometric means of &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> and &sigma;<sub>AP</sub> in the grid cells over Norwegian Sea were in the range 5–10 Mm<sup>−1</sup> and <1 Mm<sup>−1</sup>. The source areas associated with high &alpha;<sub>SP</sub> values were norther than those for &sigma;<sub>SP</sub> and &sigma;<sub>AP</sub>. The trajectory statistical approach and a simple wind sector classification agreed well.
Reference Key
virkkula2011atmosphericseasonal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;A. Virkkula;J. Backman;P. P. Aalto;M. Hulkkonen;L. Riuttanen;T. Nieminen;M. dal Maso;L. Sogacheva;G. de Leeuw;M. Kulmala
Journal Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
Year 2011
DOI
10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.