dilemas políticos y éticos en torno a las violaciones a los derechos humanos en el cono sur

Clicks: 158
ID: 178478
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #33 of 56 articles by views in Nature human behaviour

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

RESUMEN: Pese al considerable tiempo transcurrido desde que se abriera la transición a la democracia en los países del Cono Sur, las cuestiones irresueltas en torno a las graves violaciones de derechos humanos ocurridas durante los gobiernos militares de las décadas de 1970 y 1980 han seguido pesando en las agendas políticas en una medida mayor a la esperada, si se toman en cuenta los fuertes mecanismos legales e ilegales de impunidad establecidos que, en gran parte, siguen vigentes. En este artículo se expone un panorama comparativo de las principales medidas adoptadas por los gobiernos de Argentina, Chile y Uruguay como respuesta a determinadas demandas sociales, en un debate que continúa hasta el presente, tanto en los ámbitos nacional como internacional.

ABSTRACT: In spite of the considerable time lapse since the beginning of the democratic transitions in the Southern Cone countries, the unresolved questions surrounding the grave human rights violations during the military regimes of the 1970s and 1980s continue dominating the political agenda more than expected. This becomes even more apparent when one considers the vitality of the legal and illegal impunity mecanisms established during these regimes. This article explores a comparative panorama of the principal methods adopted by the Argentine, Chilean and Uruguayan governments in response to certain social demands, in a debate that continues to the present, both in a national and an international context.

Reference Key
dutrnit2009amricadilemas Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Silvia DUTRÉNIT;Gonzalo VARELA PETITO
Journal Nature human behaviour
Year 2009
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.