new combined weighting model based on maximizing the difference in evaluation results and its application

Clicks: 13
ID: 178263
2015
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #948 of 1,093 articles by views in journal of power sources

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,093 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This paper presents an approach for weighting indices in the comprehensive evaluation. In accordance with the principle that the entire difference of various evaluation objects is to be maximally differentiated, an adjusted weighting coefficient is introduced. Based on the idea of maximizing the difference between the adjusted evaluation scores of each evaluation object and their mean, an objective programming model is established with more obvious differentiation between evaluation scores and the combined weight coefficient determined, thereby avoiding contradictory and less distinguishable evaluation results of single weighting methods. The proposed model is demonstrated using 2,044 observations. The empirical results show that the combined weighting method has the least misjudgment probability, as well as the least error probability, when compared with four single weighting methods, namely, G1, G2, variation coefficient, and deviation methods.
Reference Key
meng2015mathematicalnew Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Bin Meng;Guotai Chi
Journal journal of power sources
Year 2015
DOI
10.1155/2015/239634
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/239634
Keywords
civil engineering (general)mathematics engineering (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.