anthropomorphiс formidentinents-markers of significative field of catholic ethnoreligious space
Clicks: 121
ID: 177576
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
121 views
27 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #77 of 153 articles by views in ifmbe proceedings
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 153 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The paper deals with an attempt to explicate the anthropomorphic formidentinentsmarkers of the significative field of Catholic ethnoreligious space on the basis of developed by the author model of the structure of significative field of Catholicism as the exposed system ща religious, cultural, ethnic, social and other markers, which is consisted of the following basic significative structural subsystems: 1) anthropomorphic significative subsystem, which includes humansimilar (manlike) and personificated symbolic constructions, monuments and architectural ensembles, as well as symbols of human body parts, their combinations and signals; 2) zoomorphic significative subsystem, which includes animalsimilar significative constructions and signs of their separate bodyparts, as well as symbols of their lifeproducts; 3) vegetomorphic significative subsystem, which includes plantsimilar significative elements and food products; 4) geomorphic significative subsystem; 5) geometric significative subsystem; 6) astral significative subsystem; 7) coloristic significative subsystem; 8) toposinstalative significative subsystem; 9) objectiveinstrumental significative subsystem; 10) architectural exteriorinterior significative subsystem; 11) abstractive significative subsystem; 12) actional significative subsystem.
Anthropomorphic significative subsystem with its formidentinentsmarkers of the significative field of Catholic ethnoreligious space includes visualized in space anthropomorphic and personificated symbolic constructions and formelements, that are explicated via objectivematerial patterns: paintings, architecture, etc., and are often linked with various religious and ethnic symbolic systems.
| Reference Key |
kryachko2014grananthropomorphi
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;V. I. Kryachko |
| Journal | ifmbe proceedings |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.