popular literature and cultural memory on the examples of luka iliĆ oriovČanin and andrija kaČiĆ mioŠiĆ
Clicks: 216
ID: 177559
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
216 views
47 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #16 of 58 articles by views in afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi uluslararası mühendislik teknolojileri ve uygulamalı bilimler dergisi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this paper we approach popular literature from the perspective of cultural memory studies, relying mostly on the theoretical insights of Jan and Aleida Assmann. Jan Assmann distinguishes between two modes of memory: communicative memory and cultural memory. Communicative memory relates to a group, takes the form of everyday communications, includes three to four interacting generations and is best illustrated by a mode of biographical memory. On the other hand, cultural memory is based on fixed points in the past, a high degree of formation and ceremonial communication, depends on a specialized practice and always has its specialized carriers.
In this paper a more detailed analysis of the way in which popular literary texts form fixed points in the past, the symbolic figures of memory, is carried out.
The importance of the categories of truth, memory and history is shown on the examples of popular folk writers Andrija Kačić Miošić and Luka Ilić Oriovčanin. Special attention is given to the forewords to Razgovor ugodni naroda slovinskoga (1756, 1759) and Lovorike (1874; 1990). Both Kačić and Oriovčanin show aspirations towards saving historic events and persons from being forgotten. We analyse the importance of memory in popular poetics by asking the following questions: a) what is the subject of memory; b) who remembers; and c) which mechanisms enable memory? A popular writer uses discursive strategies to constitute a community that remembers, as well as content that he wants to keep in memory. He refers to the historical truth, though the category of truth in popular texts can be read, in accordance with Foucault’s approach, as a product of discourse.
| Reference Key |
tomai2016fluminensia:popular
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Josipa Tomašić |
| Journal | afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi uluslararası mühendislik teknolojileri ve uygulamalı bilimler dergisi |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.