immunogenicity and safety of an as03a-adjuvanted h5n1 influenza vaccine in a taiwanese population

Clicks: 240
ID: 177419
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #104 of 246 articles by views in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 246 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A multicenter study (NCT00449670) conducted across Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand evaluated the safety and manufacturing consistency of four formulations of an AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in terms of immune response against the vaccine-homologous strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004). This manuscript presents data from the Taiwanese population. Methods: A total of 400 individuals, aged 18–60 years, were randomized into six groups (2:2:2:2:1:1 ratio) to receive two doses (21 days apart) of one of the four adjuvanted formulations (H5N1-AS03A-groups) or one of the two nonadjuvanted formulations (H5N1-DIL-groups). Blood samples collected before vaccination (Day 0) and 21 days after each vaccine dose were analyzed using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Adverse events were recorded. Results: All four AS03A-adjuvanted formulations induced comparable immune responses against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain; following the second dose, immune response in terms of HI antibodies was higher in the H5N1-AS03A-groups {seroprotection rate=91.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 87.9–94.4]; geometric mean titer (GMT)=177.6 (95% CI: 153.2–206.0)} compared with the H5N1-DIL-groups [seroprotection rates=5.0% (95% CI: 1.4–12.3); GMT=6.3 (95% CI: 5.4–7.4)]. Immune response against the heterologous A/Indonesia/05/2005 strain was also stronger in the H5N1-AS03A-groups [seroprotection rate=45.6% (95% CI: 40.0–51.4); GMT=20.5 (95% CI: 17.8–23.7)] compared with the H5N1-DIL groups [seroprotection rate=0.0% (95% CI: 0.0–4.5); GMT=5.0 (95% CI: 5.0–5.0)]. The overall reactogenicity profile of the adjuvanted formulations was clinically acceptable. Conclusion: The AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine formulations induced stronger immune response against the vaccine-homologous and heterologous strains than the nonadjuvanted formulations. The AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine demonstrated a good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in the Taiwanese population.
Reference Key
hwang2011journalimmunogenicity Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Shinn-Jang Hwang;Shan-Chwen Chang;Chong-Jen Yu;Yu-Jiun Chan;Tzeng-Ji Chen;Shie-Liang Hsieh;Hsiu-Yun Lai;Ming-Hsien Lin;Jui-Yao Liu;Gary Ong;Francois Roman;Mamadou Dramé;Hans L. Bock;Pan-Chyr Yang
Journal Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters
Year 2011
DOI
10.1016/j.jfma.2011.11.009
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.