unfavorable attitudes towards women leaders. an instrument to assess them

Clicks: 4
ID: 177230
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #59 of 60 articles by views in Work

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

The main objective of the investigation consisted in designing a test to evaluate unfavorable attitudes towards women leaders. Based on Peters, Terborg and Taylor test –WAMS-, it was designed the instrument ACT-ML. This one contains 7 items and presents two dimensions, one evaluates the level that people consider if women display characteristics associate with leadership (Instrumental characteristics); and the other evaluates the level of acceptance of women like leaders (Acceptance Feminine Leadership). 789 subjects participated, 419 male (53,1%) and 370 female (46,9%) (Age average = 36,52; SD = 11,7). 45,8% (n = 361) of the participants occupied directive position and the 54,2% (n = 428) were subordinates. Results indicated good psychometric properties (reliability and validity). In addition, it was tried to verify the existence of significant differences according to sex and position (leader-subordinate), finding differences in favor of men and followers in a greater level of unfavorable attitudes to women leaders.

Reference Key
perugini2011summaunfavorable Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;María Laura Lupano Perugini;Alejandro Castro Solano
Journal Work
Year 2011
DOI
10.18774/summa-vol8.num2-84
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.