brief communication "improving the actual coverage of subsampling confidence intervals in atmospheric time series analysis"
Clicks: 199
ID: 176818
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
199 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #64 of 169 articles by views in BMC research notes
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 169 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In atmospheric time series analysis, where only one record is typically available, subsampling (which works under the weakest assumptions among resampling methods), is especially useful. In particular, it yields large-sample confidence intervals of <i>asymptotically</i> correct coverage probability. Atmospheric records, however, are often not long enough, causing a substandard coverage of subsampling confidence intervals. In the paper, the subsampling methodology is extended to become more applicable in such practically important cases.
| Reference Key |
gluhovsky2012nonlinearbrief
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;A. Gluhovsky;T. Nielsen |
| Journal | BMC research notes |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.5194/npg-19-473-2012
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.