questioning conventional wisdom regarding the most suitable sequence of enzyme usage in pulp bleaching
Clicks: 245
ID: 176376
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
245 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #96 of 185 articles by views in medical archives (sarajevo, bosnia and herzegovina)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 185 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Increased public scrutiny and governmental legislation towards the pulp and paper industries have motivated industrialists and researchers to seek improved bleaching sequences having the potential to minimize pollutants in bleach effluent generated during manufacturing of paper. Discovery of toxic chlorinated organics and their components in bleach effluents has focused people’s attention towards finding alternative ways of bleaching pulp. Use of enzymes at industrial scale has become well known, but still it is not clear whether the sequence of enzymatic treatment most often employed in industrial applications represents the best overall practice. The point of enzyme addition is critically important to maximize benefits. Many publications describe the use of an enzyme treatment stage before the use of chemicals in a bleaching process. Insufficient attention has been paid to the alternatives of adding an enzyme in between chemical bleaching agents (intermediate) or at the end of the bleaching process.
| Reference Key |
gangwar2015bioresourcesquestioning
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Avdhesh Kumar Gangwar;N. Tejo Prakash;Ranjana Prakash |
| Journal | medical archives (sarajevo, bosnia and herzegovina) |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.15376/biores.11.1.6-7
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.