higher education student´s approaches to learning according to their perception of the context of course and classroom

Clicks: 89
ID: 175389
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #31 of 47 articles by views in insights into imaging

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The objective of this research was to analyze the relationship between the perception of teaching and learning classroom contexts and perception of course context with approaches to learning for college students. These influences are contrasted by degree, campus and courses. The sample is composed by 524 students of first and second year of Infant and Primary Education, Nursing and Polytechnics of Alava and Guipuzcoa campus. Used scales are the R-SPQ-2F (Biggs, Kember y Leung, 2001) to measure the student´s approaches to learning and the subscales of general Questionnaire of Teaching´s and Learning’s Strategies (TS-LSQ) (San Fabián, Argós, Goikoetxea, 2009; Goikoetxea, Aramendi, Bujan, Rekalde y Ros, 2010) to measure the classroom´s context and current context. The study served to confirm the importance of two contextual variables poorly studied until now, the classroom context and the context of course, and its relations with the learning approach of university students. The classroom context is a variable that differentiates between degrees and also is related to significant variations with deep and surface approaches of students. The variable context of course is manifested as a specific variable of degree: the most significant differences for this variable are between the same students when they are in first or second year of career.
Reference Key
pirola2014contextoshigher Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Javier Goikoetxea Piérola;Iker Ros Martínez de Lahidalga;Karmele Buján Vidales
Journal insights into imaging
Year 2014
DOI
10.18172/con.2590
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.