períodos de interferência das plantas daninhas na cultura do algodoeiro (gossypium hirsutum) weed interference periods in cotton crop (gossypium hirsutum)
Clicks: 26
ID: 174940
2002
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
7.5
/100
26 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #94 of 96 articles by views in anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Com o objetivo de determinar os efeitos de períodos de controle e de convivência das plantas daninhas na produtividade da cultura do algodoeiro (Gossypium hirsutum), cultivar Delta-Opal, realizou-se um experimento que constou de dois grupos de tratamentos. No primeiro, a cultura permaneceu livre da competição das plantas daninhas desde a emergência até 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63 dias e colheita (159 dias). No segundo, a cultura permaneceu em competição com a comunidade infestante desde a emergência até os mesmos períodos descritos para a primeira série de tratamentos. Dentre as espécies de plantas daninhas encontradas na área experimental, destacaram-se a tiririca (Cyperus rotundus), o fedegoso (Senna obtusifolia), a anileira (Indigofera hirsuta) e o capim-carrapicho (Cenchrus echinatus). Pelas condições edáficas, climáticas e florísticas sob as quais foi conduzida a cultura de algodão, o Período Anterior à Interferência (PAI) dessa comunidade que reduziu em 5% a produtividade da cultura foi de oito dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE); o Período Total de Prevenção da Interferência (PTPI) foi de 66 DAE; e o Período Crítico de Prevenção da Interferência (PCPI) foi dos 8 aos 66 DAE.
In order to evaluate the effects of weed control and weed coexistence periods on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar Delta Opal yield, an experiment was carried out consisting of two treatment groups. In the first, the crop was weed free from from emergence until 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63 days, and harvest (159 days) respectively. In the second group, the crop was in competition with the weed community from emergence until the same period, as described for the first series of treatment, respectively. Among the weed species found in the experimental area, the most important were purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus), sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia), indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus). The period after cotton plant emergence and previous to weed interference, which reduced cotton yield in 5% was 8 days (DAE); the Total Period of Interference Prevention (TPIP) was 66 DAE and the Critical Period of Interference Prevention (CPIP) was between 8 to 66 DAE.
In order to evaluate the effects of weed control and weed coexistence periods on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar Delta Opal yield, an experiment was carried out consisting of two treatment groups. In the first, the crop was weed free from from emergence until 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63 days, and harvest (159 days) respectively. In the second group, the crop was in competition with the weed community from emergence until the same period, as described for the first series of treatment, respectively. Among the weed species found in the experimental area, the most important were purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus), sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia), indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus). The period after cotton plant emergence and previous to weed interference, which reduced cotton yield in 5% was 8 days (DAE); the Total Period of Interference Prevention (TPIP) was 66 DAE and the Critical Period of Interference Prevention (CPIP) was between 8 to 66 DAE.
| Reference Key |
salgado2002plantaperodos
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;T.P. Salgado;P.L.C.A. Alves;E.D. Mattos;J.F. Martins;D.D. Hernandez |
| Journal | anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry |
| Year | 2002 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-83582002000300007
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.