persistência do herbicida clomazone no solo e na água quando aplicado na cultura do arroz irrigado, sistema pré-germinado clomazone soil and water persistence when applied in water seeded rice
Clicks: 270
ID: 174908
2001
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
31.0
/100
270 views
20 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #38 of 96 articles by views in anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A persistência do herbicida clomazone aplicado diretamente na lâmina d'água de arroz irrigado foi avaliada em três experimentos conduzidos em um solo do tipo argilo-siltoso, na Estação Experimental da EPAGRI em Itajaí-SC, a partir de duas formulações do herbicida clomazone, 500 CE (concentrado emulsionável) e 360 CS (concentrado solúvel), na mesma dose do ingrediente ativo. Os experimentos com arroz irrigado em sistema pré-germinado foram conduzidos, durante três anos consecutivos, nas safras de 1996/97 a 98/99; o herbicida foi quantificado em solo e água, antes e após a aplicação, sendo após a aplicação retiradas diversas amostras de solo e água para análise até a colheita da cultura do arroz. As amostras foram analisadas através de cromatografia gasosa. No ano de 1996/97 foi avaliado o herbicida clomazone na formulação 500 CE, o qual foi detectado no solo até oito dias após a aplicação (DAA) e, na água, até 32 DAA. Na safra 1996/97 os teores de herbicida na água aos 16 dias foram em torno de 3% da quantidade aplicada. O clomazone, na formulação CS, foi detectado na água e no solo até 24 DAA, sendo o período residual desta formulação superior ao da formulação CE. Esses resultados sugerem que até três a quatro semanas após a aplicação do herbicida, nas formulações CE e CS, a água deve ser mantida dentro dos quadros, a fim de minimizar os riscos de arrastamento do produto para fora da lavoura e a conseqüente contaminação das águas superficiais.
Three field studies were carried out on a silty clay soil - Haplaquoll (Molic Gleysol), during the 1996/99 season, at Epagri/Itajaí Experimental Station in southern Brazil, 26(0) 56' 35s S and 48(0) 45' 37s W, to evaluate clomazone persistence in soil and water. Clomazone 500 EC (1996/97) and 360 CS (1997/98 and 1998/99) was applied in the water in post emergence of pre-germinated seed in flooded rice area. Herbicide concentration in the soil and water was quantified before and after spraying, through several samples of water and soil taken up to rice harvesting time and analyzed with gas chromatography. In the first year, clomazone formulation 500 CE was not detected either in soil or water after 8 and 32 days after application (DAA), respectively. In 1996/97, about 3% of the amount applied remained in the paddy water by 16 DAA. In the following years, clomazone residue was detected in water up to 24 DAA. Clomazone residue levels in soil were below detectable levels after 4 and 16 DAA, in 1997/98 and 98/99, respectively. The results show that after applying clomazone (formulations EC and CS) in the water, growers should hold the water in the fields during 3 to 4 weeks, without any outflow of the pesticide treated water to waterways, otherwise superficial water could be contaminated.
Three field studies were carried out on a silty clay soil - Haplaquoll (Molic Gleysol), during the 1996/99 season, at Epagri/Itajaí Experimental Station in southern Brazil, 26(0) 56' 35s S and 48(0) 45' 37s W, to evaluate clomazone persistence in soil and water. Clomazone 500 EC (1996/97) and 360 CS (1997/98 and 1998/99) was applied in the water in post emergence of pre-germinated seed in flooded rice area. Herbicide concentration in the soil and water was quantified before and after spraying, through several samples of water and soil taken up to rice harvesting time and analyzed with gas chromatography. In the first year, clomazone formulation 500 CE was not detected either in soil or water after 8 and 32 days after application (DAA), respectively. In 1996/97, about 3% of the amount applied remained in the paddy water by 16 DAA. In the following years, clomazone residue was detected in water up to 24 DAA. Clomazone residue levels in soil were below detectable levels after 4 and 16 DAA, in 1997/98 and 98/99, respectively. The results show that after applying clomazone (formulations EC and CS) in the water, growers should hold the water in the fields during 3 to 4 weeks, without any outflow of the pesticide treated water to waterways, otherwise superficial water could be contaminated.
| Reference Key |
noldin2001plantapersistncia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;J.A. Noldin;L.C. Hermes;E.F. Fay;D.S. Eberhardt;M.A. Rossi |
| Journal | anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry |
| Year | 2001 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-83582001000300013
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.