strategic alliance typology and survival chances among medium-sized manufacturing firms in tanzania
Clicks: 310
ID: 174728
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
310 views
56 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #9 of 24 articles by views in journal of surgery and medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Firms strive to grow and survive. The survival chances can be fostered by a list of business strategies, such as strategic alliances. Different types of strategic alliances exist. This study groups the typology into manufacturing and non-manufacturing alliances. Little research has been done on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), particularly Medium-Sized Enterprises (MEs), from the manufacturing industry in the least developed countries such as Tanzania in relation to the alliance typology and partnering firms’ survival chances that can be explained by an ability to accumulate resources and reduce both costs and risks. A cross-sectional survey design and multistage probability sampling technique enabled the participation of 398 CEOs from three zones of Tanzania whose options were collected through questionnaires. In the context of this paper, both the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) are applied to explain the two main alliance types and how they predict firms’ survival chances respectively. To a great extent, we find that there exists a relationship between alliance typology and both the reduction of costs and risks, as well as resource accessibility. However, we argue that partners could adopt alliance types that concurrently reduce the costs and risks; but at the same time enabling them to acquire resources if they would carefully study and establish the link between costs, risks and resources.
| Reference Key |
kafigi2015journalstrategic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jeje Kafigi |
| Journal | journal of surgery and medicine |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.7441/joc.2015.02.03
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.