traffic recovery time estimation under different flow regimes in traffic simulation

Clicks: 265
ID: 174452
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #9 of 22 articles by views in macworld-boulder

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Incident occurrence and recovery are critical to the smooth and efficient operations of freeways. Although many studies have been performed on incident detection, clearance, and management, travelers and traffic managers are unable to accurately predict the length of time required for full traffic recovery after an incident occurs. This is because there are no practical studies available to estimate post-incident recovery time. This paper estimates post-incident traffic recovery time along an urban freeway using traffic simulation and compares the simulation results with shockwave theory calculations. The simulation model is calibrated and validated using a freeway segment in Baltimore, MD. The model explores different flow regimes (traffic intensity) and incident duration for different incident severity, and their effects on recovery time. A total of 726 simulations are completed using VISSIM software. Finally, the impact of congestion and incident delay on the highway network is quantified by a regression formula to predict traffic recovery time. The developed regression model predicts post-incident traffic recovery time based on traffic intensity, incident duration, and incident severity (ratio of lanes closure). In addition, three regression models are developed for different flow regimes of near-capacity, moderate, and low-traffic intensity. The model is validated by collected field data on two different urban freeways.
Reference Key
jeihani2015journaltraffic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Mansoureh Jeihani;Petronella James;Anthony A. Saka;Anam Ardeshiri
Journal macworld-boulder
Year 2015
DOI
10.1016/j.jtte.2015.08.001
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.