‘não me venha com direitos humanos’: por uma compreensão do sujeito no ‘homicídio por auto de resistência’

Clicks: 257
ID: 174196
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 29 articles by views in journal of happiness studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

O presente artigo tem por objetivo discutir de que forma a reinterpretação do fenômeno do “homicídio por auto de resistência” como signo da chamada “violência policial” e sob o rótulo de “violação de direitos humanos” produz, diferentemente do que esperam teóricos e ativistas de direitos, um argumento desprovido de coerência semântica para o debate público. Procura-se refletir a partir da construção discursiva de “direitos humanos” no campo judiciário para, então, percebê-los a partir das lógicas discursivas dos atores em disputa nessa problemática do “auto de resistência”, discutindo como a linguagem dos direitos é mobilizada nas disputas cotidianas.

 

The article ‘Don’t Talk to Me about Human Rights’: For an Understanding of the Subject in the ‘Homicide for Resisting Arrest’ aims to discuss how the reinterpretation of the phenomenon of “homicide for resisting arrest” as a sign of so-called “police violence” and under the label of “human rights violation” produces, unlike what theorists and activists expect, an argument devoid of semantic coherence for the public debate. The discursive construction of “human rights” in the judicial field is contemplated so such rights can then be interpreted based on the rationale of the opposing actors in this problem of death justified by “resisted arrest”, discussing how the language of rights is engaged in everyday disputes.

Reference Key
leandro2014dilemas:no Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Sylvia Amanda da Silva Leandro;Luiz Eduardo Figueira
Journal journal of happiness studies
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.