how is a philosophy of photography possible?
Clicks: 153
ID: 174025
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
153 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #63 of 87 articles by views in Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything
possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the
term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we
talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the
term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should
philosophy of photography be any different? All of the abovementioned
questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is,
indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy
of science and technology and philosophy of politics are.
| Reference Key |
valery2015filozofijahow
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Savchuk Valery |
| Journal | Plants (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.2298/FID1504893S
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.