Selection of Robust and Relevant Features for 3-D Steganalysis.
Clicks: 159
ID: 17361
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
63.9
/100
159 views
128 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #36 of 46 articles by views in ieee transactions on cybernetics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While 3-D steganography and digital watermarking represent methods for embedding information into 3-D objects, 3-D steganalysis aims to find the hidden information. Previous research studies have shown that by estimating the parameters modeling the statistics of 3-D features and feeding them into a classifier we can identify whether a 3-D object carries secret information. For training the steganalyzer, such features are extracted from cover and stego pairs, representing the original 3-D objects and those carrying hidden information. However, in practical applications, the steganalyzer would have to distinguish stego-objects from cover-objects, which most likely have not been used during the training. This represents a significant challenge for existing steganalyzers, raising a challenge known as the cover source mismatch (CSM) problem, which is due to the significant limitation of their generalization ability. This paper proposes a novel feature selection algorithm taking into account both feature robustness and relevance in order to mitigate the CSM problem in 3-D steganalysis. In the context of the proposed methodology, new shapes are generated by distorting those used in the training. Then a subset of features is selected from a larger given set, by assessing their effectiveness in separating cover-objects from stego-objects among the generated sets of objects. Two different measures are used for selecting the appropriate features: 1) the Pearson correlation coefficient and 2) the mutual information criterion.
| Reference Key |
li2018selectionieee
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Li, Zhenyu;Bors, Adrian G; |
| Journal | ieee transactions on cybernetics |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1109/TCYB.2018.2883082
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.