opinião de estudantes dos cursos de direito e medicina da universidade federal do rio grande do norte sobre o aborto no brasil opinion of medical and law students of federal university of rio grande do norte about abortion in brazil
Clicks: 366
ID: 173531
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
366 views
58 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #29 of 101 articles by views in 2018 international conference on information technologies, infotech 2018 - proceedings
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Analisar e comparar o conhecimento e opiniões de estudantes dos cursos de Direito e Medicina sobre a questão do aborto no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo transversal envolvendo 125 alunos concluintes do ano de 2010, sendo 52 de Medicina (grupo MED) e 73 de Direito (grupo DIR), com uso de questionário construído com base em estudos publicados sobre o tema. As variáveis dependentes foram: acompanhamento do debate sobre aborto, conhecimento sobre situações em que o aborto é permitido por lei no Brasil, opinião sobre situações em que concorda com a ampliação do permissivo legal para interrupção da gestação e conhecimento prévio de alguém que já induziu o aborto. As variáveis independentes incluíram dados sociodemográficos como sexo, idade, renda familiar e curso de graduação. Análise estatística: testes do χ² e exato de Fisher, com nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos entrevistados relatou acompanhar a discussão sobre o aborto no Brasil (67,3% do grupo MED e 70,2% grupo DIR, p>0,05). Na avaliação do conhecimento sobre o tema, os estudantes de Medicina demonstraram percentual de acerto significativamente superior aos estudantes de Direito (100,0 e 87,5%, respectivamente; p=0,005), em relação à legalidade do aborto na gravidez resultante de estupro. Elevados percentuais de acertos também foram observados nos dois grupos, em relação à gravidez impondo risco de vida à gestante, mas sem significância estatística (94,2 e 87,5% para os grupos MED e DIR, respectivamente). Percentuais significativos dos entrevistados declararam-se favoráveis à ampliação legal do aborto em outras situações, com destaque para: anencefalia (68%), gravidez com prejuízos graves à saúde física da mulher (42,1%) e para feto com qualquer malformação congênita grave (33,7%). CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados demonstraram um conhecimento satisfatório dos concluintes dos cursos de Direito e Medicina quanto à legalidade do aborto no Brasil, aliado a uma tendência favorável à ampliação do permissivo legal para outras situações não previstas em lei. Ressalta-se a importância da inclusão dessa temática nos currículos de graduação e do desenvolvimento de estratégias de ensino interprofissional.
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the knowledge and opinions of Law and Medical students regarding the issue of abortion in Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving 125 graduate students from the class of 2010. Of these, 52 were medical students (MED group) and 73 law students (LAW group). A questionnaire was applied based on published research about the topic. Dependent variables were: monitoring the abortion debate, knowledge concerning situations where abortion is permitted under Brazilian law, opinion about situations that agree with extending legal permission to terminate pregnancy and prior knowledge of someone who has undergone induced abortion. Independent variables were: sex, age, household income and graduation course. Statistical analysis: χ² and Fisher's exact tests, with the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: Most interviewees reported monitoring the debate on abortion in Brazil (67.3% of the MED group and 70.2% of the LAW group, p>0.05). When assessing knowledge on the subject, medical students had a significantly higher percentage of correct answers than law students (100.0 and 87.5%, respectively; p=0.005) regarding the legality of abortion for pregnancies resulting from rape. Elevated percentages of correct responses were also recorded for both groups in relation to pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother (94.2 and 87.5% for MED and LAW groups, respectively), but without statistical significance. A significant percentage of respondents declared they were in favor of extending legal abortion to other situations, primarily in cases of anencephaly (68%), pregnancy severely harming the mother's physical health (42.1%) or that of the fetus in cases of severe congenital malformation (33.7%). CONCLUSION: Results showed a satisfactory knowledge on the part of law and medical school graduate students regarding the legality of abortion in Brazil, combined with a favorable trend towards extending legal permission to other situations not covered by the law. It is important to underscore the inclusion of this topic in the undergraduate curriculum and the development of inter-professional teaching strategies.
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the knowledge and opinions of Law and Medical students regarding the issue of abortion in Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving 125 graduate students from the class of 2010. Of these, 52 were medical students (MED group) and 73 law students (LAW group). A questionnaire was applied based on published research about the topic. Dependent variables were: monitoring the abortion debate, knowledge concerning situations where abortion is permitted under Brazilian law, opinion about situations that agree with extending legal permission to terminate pregnancy and prior knowledge of someone who has undergone induced abortion. Independent variables were: sex, age, household income and graduation course. Statistical analysis: χ² and Fisher's exact tests, with the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: Most interviewees reported monitoring the debate on abortion in Brazil (67.3% of the MED group and 70.2% of the LAW group, p>0.05). When assessing knowledge on the subject, medical students had a significantly higher percentage of correct answers than law students (100.0 and 87.5%, respectively; p=0.005) regarding the legality of abortion for pregnancies resulting from rape. Elevated percentages of correct responses were also recorded for both groups in relation to pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother (94.2 and 87.5% for MED and LAW groups, respectively), but without statistical significance. A significant percentage of respondents declared they were in favor of extending legal abortion to other situations, primarily in cases of anencephaly (68%), pregnancy severely harming the mother's physical health (42.1%) or that of the fetus in cases of severe congenital malformation (33.7%). CONCLUSION: Results showed a satisfactory knowledge on the part of law and medical school graduate students regarding the legality of abortion in Brazil, combined with a favorable trend towards extending legal permission to other situations not covered by the law. It is important to underscore the inclusion of this topic in the undergraduate curriculum and the development of inter-professional teaching strategies.
| Reference Key |
medeiros2012revistaopinio
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Robinson Dias de Medeiros;George Dantas de Azevedo;Emilly Auxiliadora Almeida de Oliveira;Fábio Aires Araújo;Francisco Jakson Benigno Cavalcanti;Gabriela Lucena de Araújo;Igor Rebouças Castro |
| Journal | 2018 international conference on information technologies, infotech 2018 - proceedings |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-72032012000100004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Your session, form security (XSRF) and this choice; if you came through a member's referral link, its code for 30 days (referral_token). Journament's own cookies only.
Google Analytics 4 (Google LLC, USA): measures which pages are visited; the _ga and _ga_* cookies are kept for up to 2 years.
Google AdSense (Google LLC, USA): shows, measures and may personalise ads on journal, article and home pages; the __gads, __gpi and __eoi cookies are kept for up to 13 months.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.